Shaykh Sulaymaan Ar-Ruhaylee said, “Without a doubt, Salafiyyah is not restricted to names [of certain scholars] within Salafiyyah!
For example, it is said that those scholars are known for Manhaj (methodology). Or those [scholars] statements’ are to be taken.
Rather this is a type of hizbiyyah (partisanship).
However it only happens within the framework of Salafiyyah. No doubt that the Salafis have scholars who are well known for their Salafiyyah. They are those who are not known to be in opposition to the methodology of the Salaf. These are the people of knowledge.
As we said, we do not ascribe the scholars to a particular place, such that we say ‘the scholars of Madinah’, ‘the scholars of Makkah’, or ‘the scholars of Riyadh’.
Instead, all of the scholars of the Salafis statements are considered. The claim that so and so is correct [all the time], so all of his statements are taken is not correct. This is not in agreement with the methodology of the Salaf may Allah be pleased with them all.
The people [today] are between two sides. A party that want to include within the scholars of the Salafis people who are not from them, even if these people oppose the methodology of the Salaf. Whether he is a Salafi [and] displayed Salafiyyah or [he] was never a Salafi.
I will mention regarding one of the brothers who asked me about the mistake or mistakes of one of the organisations that are around. I mentioned many things, from them they bring Abul Hasan al Ma’rabi and there is no doubt that he has the most severe partisanship from what is apparent from his speech.
He [the questioner] said that you all want to restrict and limit Salafiyyah to specific scholars.
I replied that this isn’t an issue of restricting and limiting. We want to differentiate the Salafis from others.
Whoever opposes the methodology [of the Salaf] and says that I want to make the Manhaj broad, I want to make Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamaah extensive and enter people into Salafiyyah, this person has left [Salafiyyah] and is not considered from among the scholars of the Salafis.
Or that you come and say, I won’t listen to anyone apart from so and so. His statement[s] are the truth and everybody that opposes him…
[Then the Shaykh says], I mentioned that some people, if some of the Salafi scholars differ [in an issue], and it is said to them, ‘come let’s look into the issue’ they will say ‘you have doubts’, ‘you have doubts in the scholars’. This in reality without a doubt is wrong and it’s necessary that we warn from this! We must pay attention to these consequences.
It’s not permissible to form partisanship to specific scholars. Aid and support is only given to the truth. Where ever the truth becomes apparent and manifest then we say it, as it is.
I have said, if there is a difference of opinion among the scholars, then we recognise their virtue, we recognise their excuses for any mistakes they have made and we follow what becomes apparent from the truth.
What you [the questioner] mention without a doubt is a reality among some of the Salafi youth; that they restrict and limit themselves to specific scholars. They believe that other than these scholars are not referred back to [in certain affairs].
In fact, I heard from some of the youth that Shaykh Saaih Al-Fawzaan is not referred back to in [issues pertaining to] Manhaj (methodology). Shaykh Saalih As-Suhaymee is not referred back to in [issues pertaining to] Manhaj. Shaykh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbaad is not referred back to in [issues pertaining to] Manhaj. This is without a doubt incorrect. This is without a doubt a type of partisanship (hizbiyyah) and a form of following one’s desires. It’s befitting that it is paid [close] attention to and stayed away from.
In addition, I say it’s incumbent that we display affection with our brothers.
I mentioned this in my speech but I’ll repeat it due to its relevance. It’s not appropriate that we [Salafis] meet one another in two rows [opposing sides]. It’s imperative that we are eager to become – in accordance to our ability – one unified row. Even if we see that some of our brothers are in error, we should sit with them, clarify their mistake that they are upon and we should show a fervent desire to unify our words in accordance to the truth! We don’t leave the truth, rather we unify the words of the people of truth with the truth.”
Ref: An audio Q&A by Shaykh Sulaymaan Ar-Ruhaylee, translated by Ismaeel Beaumont (student at Madeenah University in Saudi Arabia), on 10th Rajab, 1436 (Wednesday 29th April 2015) sent to me via what’s app
Posted Abdul Kareem Ibn Ozzie